home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1759>
- <title>
- July 03, 1989: Cashing In On Ethics
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- July 03, 1989 Great Ball Of Fire:Angry Sun
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 16
- Cashing In On Ethics
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Congress may get a pay raise in exchange for major reforms
- </p>
- <p> Last February Congress tried to give itself a hefty raise by
- playing the political equivalent of three-card monte: let the
- 51% increase recommended by a special commission go into
- effect, then appease constituents by voting against it, and keep
- the cash. But scandal-weary voters saw through the game, and the
- pay hike for Congressmen, federal judges and skilled federal
- employees died a humiliating death. Ever since, the search has
- been on for a more palatable proposal. Last week there were
- indications from House Speaker Thomas Foley and aides to
- President Bush that new ideas for boosting top Government
- salaries were in the offing, but they would be tied to radical
- reforms of the way Congress does its business.
- </p>
- <p> The President is readying a package of reforms to fulfill
- his campaign pledge to improve Government ethics. The sweetener
- for Congress would be a pay raise, though Bush is unlikely to
- specify an amount. In exchange, Bush would probably call for a
- ban on speaking fees and strict limits on the use of campaign
- funds for office or personal expenses. He might call for an
- outright ban on political-action committees that are connected
- to labor or business groups. To head off a congressional outcry
- about the lost sources of campaign funds, the President may
- propose raising the $1,000 limit on individual political
- contributions to candidates.
- </p>
- <p> Foley is thinking along similar lines. Several proposals for
- limiting honorariums (as lucrative speaking fees paid by
- special-interest groups are euphemistically labeled) are being
- considered by a bipartisan House panel. The plan considered most
- likely to succeed would gradually phase out speaking fees as
- House and Senate salaries increased from their present level of
- $89,500. Thus a 7% pay raise would be accompanied by a 7%
- lowering in the earnings allowed from speeches, which at
- present are 30% of salary for a House member and 40% for a
- Senator.
- </p>
- <p> Foley also suggests that the traditional linking of
- Government salaries should be ended, and judicial and Executive
- pay be considered separately from that of legislators. In that,
- he is responding to pressure from judges and the White House,
- which has expressed concern about the departures of several
- highly skilled professionals, particularly from NASA and the
- National Institutes of Health. The latest loss: H. Robert
- Heller, a member of the Federal Reserve Board, who resigned
- last week, citing his stagnant pay.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-